Resources Archives - Page 35 of 37

Does an Anonymous Call Give Reasonable Suspicion of DUI

In Prado Navarette v. California[1], the United States Supreme Court held that an anonymous 911 call (alleging specific reckless driving behavior), which resulted in the caller’s car being run off the road, gave officers reasonable suspicion of drunk driving. This, then, justified the traffic stop of that vehicle, and the arrest of the occupants for transporting marijuana. The vote was a 5-4 split. On […]

Does an Anonymous Call Give Reasonable Suspicion of DUI Continue Reading

Fernandez v. California: Removal of an Objector During a Consent Search

Last week, the United States Supreme issued a decision in Fernandez v. California[1] clarifying an earlier decision in Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006), which held that when multiple individuals reside at a premises, if a physically present individual objects to a warrantless search of the residence, the police may not search the residence even if another occupant consents to the search. The

Fernandez v. California: Removal of an Objector During a Consent Search Continue Reading

The Path to Rebuilding a Police Department Takes ACTion: Accountability, Consistency, and Transparency

Written By: Chief Thomas Grimaldi, Bristol Police Department, Bristol, CT Every police department, at one time or another has had its low points. Some, more serious and more infamous than others. One only needs to look back into history books to identify police departments clouded by scandals. In 1971 the Knapp Commission uncovered corruption in New York City Police department, later chronicled in the

The Path to Rebuilding a Police Department Takes ACTion: Accountability, Consistency, and Transparency Continue Reading

Your Department Is Only as Strong as Your Weakest Supervisor

When you joined the department as a new officer your first taste of supervision was through the Sergeant. Most of us look at the Sergeant and say “that’s a good job.” If your experience is like mine I remember the supervisor saying, “don’t bother me unless someone dies.” That was twenty years ago and, unfortunately as you all have worked toward the rank of

Your Department Is Only as Strong as Your Weakest Supervisor Continue Reading

Stanton v. Sims: Constitutionality of Officer’s Warrantless Entry Based on a Misdemeanor

The United States Supreme Court released a decision on November 4, 2013 pertaining to the constitutionality of a police officer’s warrantless pursuit of a suspect into a home based on probable cause of the commission of a misdemeanor crime.[1] A ruling from the Supreme Court is important to clarify the standards applicable to search and seizure law. This decision identifies a conflict between the

Stanton v. Sims: Constitutionality of Officer’s Warrantless Entry Based on a Misdemeanor Continue Reading

Private Emails Are Not So Private for Government Employees

For the purpose of providing guidance to Law Enforcement our firm is dedicated to spotting emerging trends and staying abreast of developing law as advances in the technological world merge with law enforcement practices. Back in 2012, we first started discussing the effect and influence of emerging technology, and the difficulties surrounding the use, search, and seizure of cell phones in the law enforcement

Private Emails Are Not So Private for Government Employees Continue Reading

Courts Limit Cell Phone Searches Incident to Arrest

Attorney Ken Wallentine Four years ago, in Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009), the Supreme Court took a sharp turn in the law of search incident to arrest. The Court stepped back toward the two justifications for the search incident to arrest exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement—preservation of evidence and officer safety—first definitively articulated in Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752

Courts Limit Cell Phone Searches Incident to Arrest Continue Reading

Court Upholds Maryland Statute Requiring DNA Samples from Suspects Arrested for Violent Crimes : Maryland v. King

Attorney Karen J. Kruger The United States Supreme Court recently ruled in favor of the State of Maryland in its opinion in Maryland v. King, a case that evaluated the constitutionality of the taking of a DNA sample from a person arrested, but not yet convicted of a serious crime. In the case before the Court, a 53-year-old woman was raped and robbed in

Court Upholds Maryland Statute Requiring DNA Samples from Suspects Arrested for Violent Crimes : Maryland v. King Continue Reading

Officer Involved Shootings – How Are Courts Analyzing the Use of Deadly Force?

On May 13, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit came down with a favorable opinion for law enforcement involved in a fatal “officer involved shooting” incident. The Court’s opinion is well thought out and analyzes and evaluates each step of the incident as it progressed, ultimately leading to the fatal shooting of the suspect. A case such as this

Officer Involved Shootings – How Are Courts Analyzing the Use of Deadly Force? Continue Reading

Multiple Applications of Electronic Control Weapon(s): Attempt to Control or Punitive Measures?

In the past months, two different courts released decisions analyzing an officer’s use of an electronic control weapon in the context of the 4th Amendment and allegations of excessive force. Both of these decisions give insight into the manner in which courts are currently evaluating the use of the weapon, the facts and circumstances surrounding an arrest, and a comparison of the suspect’s behavior

Multiple Applications of Electronic Control Weapon(s): Attempt to Control or Punitive Measures? Continue Reading