Resources Archives - DLG Learning Center

Past Convictions, Parking-Lot Conversations, and Petty Inconsistencies Could Not Justify Prolonging the Traffic Stop in United States v. Hawkins

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recently issued an opinion in United States v. Hawkins, a case that clarifies the limits on an officer’s ability to prolong a traffic stop based on reasonable suspicion. Summary of the Facts In the early afternoon, officers from the West Virginia drug task force conducted surveillance in an area associated with high-volume drug activity. […]

Past Convictions, Parking-Lot Conversations, and Petty Inconsistencies Could Not Justify Prolonging the Traffic Stop in United States v. Hawkins Continue Reading

United States v. Ducksworth: Driver’s Hidden Gun and Dishonesty Justified Passenger Frisk

The Fifth Circuit held that officers had reasonable suspicion to conduct a protective pat-down of a vehicle passenger after discovering that the driver possessed a concealed firearm and had been dishonest about it. The court concluded that the totality of the circumstances, including the driver’s weapon, the nighttime stop in a high-crime area, and the officer being outnumbered, created reasonable suspicion that the passenger

United States v. Ducksworth: Driver’s Hidden Gun and Dishonesty Justified Passenger Frisk Continue Reading

No Shortcut Around the Fourth Amendment: Supreme Court Holds Geofence Location Data Is a Search Under the Fourth Amendment

On June 29, 2026, the Supreme Court explained how the Fourth Amendment applies to the use of a geofence warrant. In doing so, the Court was tasked with considering two questions: whether the police conducted a “search” when they obtained the cell phone location data that led to Chatrie’s arrest, and if so, whether that search was reasonable given the features of the warrant

No Shortcut Around the Fourth Amendment: Supreme Court Holds Geofence Location Data Is a Search Under the Fourth Amendment Continue Reading

United States v. Nahkai: Miranda Custody and Voluntary Interviews Outside the Home

The Tenth Circuit recently released their decision for United States v. Nahkai, which examines when someone is in custody for Miranda. The Tenth Circuit held that Andy Nahkai was not in custody for purposes of Miranda during his interview with investigators in an unlocked vehicle outside his home. The court concluded that the setting, lack of physical restraint, and overall circumstances would not have

United States v. Nahkai: Miranda Custody and Voluntary Interviews Outside the Home Continue Reading

Plate Readers and Plain View: The Fifth Circuit’s ALPR Analysis in United States v. Porter

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently released an opinion in United States v. Porter, a case that considers whether the government’s use of historical location information from a networked license plate reader system, constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment, and whether a traffic stop and seizure arising from data obtained from a license plate reader is lawful. Summary of the Facts Elijah Porter was a wanted individual in Mississippi who had an

Plate Readers and Plain View: The Fifth Circuit’s ALPR Analysis in United States v. Porter Continue Reading

United States v. Thomas: When a Consensual Encounter Becomes Probable Cause

The Eleventh Circuit’s decision in United States v. Thomas highlights the critical distinction between a consensual police encounter and a Fourth Amendment seizure. The case arose from an officer’s response to a minor complaint in a fast-food parking lot that ultimately led to the discovery of significant criminal evidence. In affirming the denial of a motion to suppress, the court emphasized that officers may approach individuals, ask questions,

United States v. Thomas: When a Consensual Encounter Becomes Probable Cause Continue Reading

United States v. Watkins a/k/a Crazy Gun: Fourth Amendment Limitations for Public Walkways and Plain View

The Tenth Circuit’s decision in United States v. Watkins examines the limits of Fourth Amendment protections in the context of motel rooms and publicly accessible walkways. The case focuses on whether an officer’s observation through a small gap in motel room curtains constituted an unlawful search. Ultimately, the court concluded that observations made with an officer’s natural senses from a publicly accessible walkway do

United States v. Watkins a/k/a Crazy Gun: Fourth Amendment Limitations for Public Walkways and Plain View Continue Reading

United States v. Coleman: Fourth Amendment Guidance on Scope of Consent and Shared Authority

The Seventh Circuit recently released a decision in United States v. Coleman. This case serves as a crucial exploration of Fourth Amendment boundaries, specifically the scope of consent and who can give it. Summary of the Facts On April 20, 2023, around 4:00 a.m., Marshfield Police Officer Jamie Kizer responded to a 911 domestic-violence call. A child in the home reported that Jaison Coleman

United States v. Coleman: Fourth Amendment Guidance on Scope of Consent and Shared Authority Continue Reading

Hawatmeh v. City of Henderson: Ninth Circuit Clarifies Standards for Use of Force in Hostage Scenarios

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently released a ruling in Hawatmeh v. City of Henderson. This case stems from a volatile hostage situation that occurred in December 2020 after Jason Bourne confronted his neighbors, Dianne Hawatmeh and her daughter Yasmeen, about making a noise complaint against him. Bourne initially walked away without issue but came running after the Hawatmehs

Hawatmeh v. City of Henderson: Ninth Circuit Clarifies Standards for Use of Force in Hostage Scenarios Continue Reading

Pena v. City of Los Angeles: Ninth Circuit Clarifies Takings Clause Limits in Police Operations

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently released an opinion in Pena v. City of Los Angeles. This case reached the court after an exercise of police power led to private property damage, raising the question of whether it could trigger compensation under the Takings Clause. Carlos Pena owned and operated a print shop in Los Angeles that he used for

Pena v. City of Los Angeles: Ninth Circuit Clarifies Takings Clause Limits in Police Operations Continue Reading