Today’s case comes to us from the D.C Circuit Court and asks the question: can a Fourth Amendment seizure take place when there is no physical seizure taking place? Our suspect today argued that officers had no reason to search his satchel, nor did they have probable cause to seize him. But it is important to note that even when you do not physically […]
Can it be a Seizure When a Person isn’t “Seized”? Continue Reading
The Legal Training Division of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers’ Office of Chief Counsel is dedicated to providing law enforcement officers with quality, useful and timely United States Supreme Court and federal Circuit Courts of Appeals reviews, interesting developments in the law, and legal articles written to clarify or highlight various issues. The views expressed in these articles are the opinions of the
Circuit Courts of Appeals – August 2021 Continue Reading
Dashcams and body-worn cameras can be both a blessing and a curse for law enforcement. They allow for the court system to view an incident in real time, but they sometimes cloud perception and make it difficult to not view an incident with 20/20 hindsight. In Cunningham v. Shelby County[i] Deputies Paschal and Wiggins appealed a case through the Sixth Circuit Court. Paschal and Wiggins were
Video, Use of Force, and Qualified Immunity Continue Reading
Fourth Circuit United States v. Buzzard, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 17518 (4th Cir. WV June 11, 2021) Around 1:30 a.m., a police officer pulled over a car for a defective brake light. Jason Buzzard was driving, and Paul Martin was in the passenger seat of the car. When the officer made contact with the Buzzard, he requested Buzzard’s license, registration, and proof of insurance.
Circuit Courts of Appeals – July 2021 Continue Reading
On June 28th, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas released a statement pertaining to the federal ban on the cultivation and use of marijuana within states where he noted that it “may no longer be necessary or proper.” This statement was made in connection with the denial of a petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in
Half In, Half Out Continue Reading
Law enforcement agencies in the United States know all too well the importance of protecting individuals’ First Amendment rights during mass demonstrations. But what happens when officers find themselves in the crosshairs of the demonstrators’ rage? This is the challenge faced by officers more and more, particularly after the in-custody death of George Floyd on May 26, 2020. Faced with the dichotomy between protecting
On June 23, 2021, the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS), in Lange v. Californiai examined whether pursuit of a fleeing misdemeanor suspect always qualifies as an exigent circumstance. SCOTUS unanimously held that it does not. Facts The defendant, Arthur Lange, was convicted of driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol. One night in 2016, Lange was on his way home when he drove past a California highway patrol officer while playing loud music with his windows down and
SCOTUS: Lange v. California Continue Reading
Our case today is another question of excessive use of force stemming from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. In this case officers arrive to the scene to handle a perceived violent individual who may or may not have been experiencing a seizure. From the facts in this case, it seems that our suspect, James O’Doan, was of sound mind and was evading police during his “episode”.
Excessive Use of Force – Ninth Circuit Continue Reading
On June 28, 2021, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) examined the topic of excessive force in the case of Lombardo v. City of St. Louis. In an unsigned opinion — and over the dissents of three justices — SCOTUS threw out the 8th Circuit Court ruling in favor of the officers—which dismissed the excessive force suit filed by the man’s parents—and
SCOTUS: Excessive Force Continue Reading
In today’s case out of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals we encounter two known drug users and Miranda rights. As a reminder, you are required to provide Miranda warnings when conducting a “custodial interrogation”. A person is in “custody” for Miranda, purposes, when there is a formal arrest, or you are restraining the person’s freedom of movement to the degree associated with a formal arrest. To determine whether a person was in custody, the court
Casual Miranda Rights – Eighth Circuit Continue Reading