Fourth Amendment Archives - Page 7 of 9

Reasonableness, Rentals, and Roadside Rights: Tenth Circuit’s take on Traffic Stop Protocols in United States v. Dawson

The recent case from the Tenth Circuit, United States v. Dawson, probes the boundaries of the Fourth Amendment’s safeguard against unreasonable searches and seizures in the context of traffic stops, specifically when the driver is operating under a rental car agreement. This case arose on the morning of October 12, 2020, when Trooper Harley Kalb was performing routine patrol duties on Highway 50 in

Reasonableness, Rentals, and Roadside Rights: Tenth Circuit’s take on Traffic Stop Protocols in United States v. Dawson Continue Reading

Seizure Scrutiny in the Streets: The Third Circuit’s Take on ‘United States v. Amos’ and the Ambiguity of Authority

The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently heard United States v. Amos, a case delves into the Fourth Amendment, specifically focusing on the threshold of reasonable suspicion required for a lawful seizure.1 On a September night in 2018, Officers Hugo Lemos and Nicholas Mastroianni, patrolling in southwest Philadelphia, received a distress call near Eddie’s Café. Upon arrival, they found the

Seizure Scrutiny in the Streets: The Third Circuit’s Take on ‘United States v. Amos’ and the Ambiguity of Authority Continue Reading

Bronx Battleground: Unpacking Fourth Amendment Tensions in US v. Hagood

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals, in the case of United States v. Hagood, recently explored the delicate balance between law enforcement prerogatives and Fourth Amendment protections. Taking place on the streets of the Bronx, New York, the defendant, Hagood, was arrested and charged with possession of a firearm after he had previously been convicted of a felony. The defendant moved to suppress the

Bronx Battleground: Unpacking Fourth Amendment Tensions in US v. Hagood Continue Reading

Duty, Dilemma, and Decisions: Leonard v. Silva’s Spotlight on Use-of-Force during Mental Health Turmoil

In a recent decision, Leonard v. Silva, et al., the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals addressed a pressing issue currently dominating the law enforcement profession.1 This pivotal case brings to the fore the nexus between § 1983 claims for excessive use of force and the intricate challenges law enforcement officers confront when responding to mental health crises in healthcare settings. The insights offered from

Duty, Dilemma, and Decisions: Leonard v. Silva’s Spotlight on Use-of-Force during Mental Health Turmoil Continue Reading

US v. Smith Unveiled: A Fresh Lens on Reasonable Suspicion in Vehicular Stops and Searches

The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently explored the case of US v. Smith, a case that guides officers through the principles of reasonable suspicion, as they pertain to police procedure in vehicular stops and searches. At around 2:00 am, two individuals, D.B. and Sharon, left a Detroit bar, with D.B. suspecting that they were being followed by a silver sedan. Evidence

US v. Smith Unveiled: A Fresh Lens on Reasonable Suspicion in Vehicular Stops and Searches Continue Reading

Force, Flight & Immunity: A Dive into the Controversy of Parsons v. City of Ann Arbor

The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued a decision in Parsons v. City of Ann Arbor, a case that grapples with the issues of qualified immunity, alleged excessive use of force, and state law assault and battery allegations. The situation stemmed from a heated encounter between a law enforcement officer and an uncooperative individual during an investigatory detention outside of a local

Force, Flight & Immunity: A Dive into the Controversy of Parsons v. City of Ann Arbor Continue Reading

Canine Conundrum: Police Dogs, Excessive Force, and Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence

The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued a decision in Putman v. Harris, a case that centers on an alleged use of excessive force during the seizure of a potentially armed person, threatening self-harm and suicide.1 The plaintiff in this case, Dillard Putman, raised a 42 U.S.C. §1983 claim, where he accused the defendant Officer of infringing upon his Fourth Amendment rights

Canine Conundrum: Police Dogs, Excessive Force, and Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence Continue Reading

Caution Ahead: Balancing First Amendment Rights and Police Enforcement in Traffic Operations

The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a decision in Friend v. Gasparino, a case that grapples with alleged violations of an individual’s First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights following the arrest of citizen Michael Friend, for displaying a sign on a public sidewalk that warned drivers of a police operation ahead. Friend pursued five claims against Officer Gasparino and the City

Caution Ahead: Balancing First Amendment Rights and Police Enforcement in Traffic Operations Continue Reading

Traffic Stop Turmoil: Reasonable Suspicion Leads to Discovery of Illegal Drugs

In United States v. Batara-Molina, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals addressed the issue of whether a traffic stop was unlawfully prolonged for a canine sniff lacking reasonable suspicion, in violation of the Fourth Amendment.1 Summary Wyoming Deputy Eric Coxbill stopped Ian Batara-Molina’s vehicle for driving 49 mph in a 45-mph zone. As he approached the car, the Deputy detected a strong flower-like odor.

Traffic Stop Turmoil: Reasonable Suspicion Leads to Discovery of Illegal Drugs Continue Reading

High-Stakes Traffic Stop: When Guns, Fugitives, and Family Collide

Background In Hemry v. Ross, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals recently addressed the issues of false arrest and excessive force during an investigative stop when Yellowstone National Park Rangers mistook the identity of a family, believing that they were a wanted fugitive tied to the murders of three women.1 While the district court denied qualified immunity to the rangers, the Tenth Circuit Court

High-Stakes Traffic Stop: When Guns, Fugitives, and Family Collide Continue Reading