On June 28, 2021, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) examined the topic of excessive force in the case of Lombardo v. City of St. Louis. In an unsigned opinion — and over the dissents of three justices — SCOTUS threw out the 8th Circuit Court ruling in favor of the officers—which dismissed the excessive force suit filed by the man’s parents—and […]
SCOTUS: Excessive Force Continue Reading
In today’s case out of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals we encounter two known drug users and Miranda rights. As a reminder, you are required to provide Miranda warnings when conducting a “custodial interrogation”. A person is in “custody” for Miranda, purposes, when there is a formal arrest, or you are restraining the person’s freedom of movement to the degree associated with a formal arrest. To determine whether a person was in custody, the court
Casual Miranda Rights – Eighth Circuit Continue Reading
Today we travel to the Fifth Circuit to review a fatal use of force case. As officers, we never want to be in the position where we get to the point of needing to deploy our firearm to protect ourselves, but as you will see in this case the use of force was more than necessary. What should have been a simple traffic stop
Fatal Use of Force – Fifth Circuit Continue Reading
On June 10, 2021, the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS), in Borden v. United States, examined whether, under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S. §924(e), crimes involving recklessness constitute “violent felonies” for sentence enhancement purposes. A fractured court ruled that it does not. Facts This case involved a provision of ACCA that imposed a 15-year minimum on anyone convicted of being a
SCOTUS: Borden v. United States Continue Reading
Welcome to the Guardian Mindset weekly recap from Daigle Law Group. These updates will help provide open and transparent information you can review and share with your agency. We believe Knowledge is Power and that we must find the most efficient ways to bring you education in the path to developing the Guardian Mindset. Recommended Viewing Recommended Reading Catch up on the latest legal updates, breaking news,
Guardian Mindset – Weekly Recap Continue Reading
United States v. Cooley, 593 U.S. _____ (2021) On June 1, 2021, the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS), in United States v. Cooley, examined the scope of American Indian tribes’ sovereign powers. In its first major opinion on the topic in decades, SCOTUS unanimously held that an Indian tribe’s police officer has the authority to temporarily detain and search a non-Indian suspected of breaking federal or state law within reservations. FACTS The defendant, Joshua
Legal Update: United States v. Cooley Continue Reading
Mickey H. Osterreicher, General Counsel, National Press Photographers Association, Reserve Deputy, Erie County Sheriff’s Office, New York “This is my job. This is my job. . . . I’m just doing my job. . . . I was sent here. . . . I’m a journalist.”1 This refrain was not enough to keep journalist Andrea Sahouri from being pepper-sprayed and arrested while covering a protest.
Police-Press Relations: The Easy Way or the Hard Way? Continue Reading
On May 17, 2021, the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS), in Caniglia v. Strom, examined whether the “community caretaking” exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement extends to the home as it does in the motor vehicle context. SCOTUS unanimously held that it did not. Facts During an argument with his wife at their home, Edward Caniglia retrieved a handgun from the bedroom, put it
SCOTUS: “There’s No Place Like Home” Continue Reading
Today, we will head to the Sunshine State to review a case involving an OUI stop, and arrest followed by an eight-hour detention. The problem in this case arises shortly after the arrestee, Seana Barnett, arrived at the booking facility and blew a .00. This case took a circuitous path from the initial stop on March 15, 2014 to the final 11th Circuit ruling issued on April 15, 2020. And, believe it or not, the case was still not over.
Continued Detention After Finding of No PC – Eleventh Circuit Continue Reading
Our case today comes to us from the Third Circuit and involves both qualified immunity and alleged excessive force. The facts of this case get a little hectic and in order to fully understand the court’s decision it is important to review how an officer is entitled to qualified immunity. When deciding if an officer is entitled to qualified immunity the officer’s actions must not violate a
UOF Following a Pursuit and Plaintiff Safety – Third Circuit Continue Reading