Legal Update

AI in Law Enforcement: Innovation, Risk, and the Road Ahead

The Future of AI in Law Enforcement The Guardian Mindset Podcast is back with a critical conversation on Artificial Intelligence in Law Enforcement. Attorney Eric Daigle sits down with Attorney Joseph Race, an expert in policy and accreditation, to break down the real-world implications of AI in policing. From predictive analytics and real-time crime centers to the legal minefield of facial recognition, this episode […]

AI in Law Enforcement: Innovation, Risk, and the Road Ahead Continue Reading

Medical Emergencies as Legal Crossroads: United States v. Hudson and the Fourth Amendment in Hospital Settings

The Seventh Circuit’s recent decision in United States v. Hudson navigates complex Fourth Amendment issues within the context of medical emergencies and law enforcement intervention. This case focuses on the complexities involved when the duties of medical personnel and police officers intersect. The case began on an early morning in January 2022, when Javares Hudson arrived at Carle BroMenn Medical Center seeking emergency treatment

Medical Emergencies as Legal Crossroads: United States v. Hudson and the Fourth Amendment in Hospital Settings Continue Reading

Dividing Lines: The Fourth Circuit’s Take on Geofence Warrants in United States v. Chatrie Amid Growing Circuit Split

In July 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an opinion in United States v. Chatrie, a case that could potentially make its way up to the Supreme Court of the United States, providing the High Court an opportunity to settle an existing circuit split over the constitutionality of geofence warrants as an investigative technique used by law enforcement.¹

Dividing Lines: The Fourth Circuit’s Take on Geofence Warrants in United States v. Chatrie Amid Growing Circuit Split Continue Reading

Midnight Missteps: The Limits of Reasonable Suspicion in Milla v. Brown

In the recent case Milla v. Brown, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit examined Fourth Amendment claims lodged against two officers for detaining and searching the plaintiff and his vehicle without adequate reasonable suspicion to justify the detention. After receiving an anonymous tip about a nearby stabbing, police in Fairfax, Virginia, responded to a gas station, which was reported to

Midnight Missteps: The Limits of Reasonable Suspicion in Milla v. Brown Continue Reading

Clarifying Consensual Encounters and the Attenuation Doctrine: Analyzing Evidence Admissibility in United States v. Cade

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently considered United States v. Cade, a case that considers the Attenuation Doctrine in the context of a vehicle search and incriminatory statements. This case arose after the defendant, Brandon Cade, and a friend, T.J., caught the attention of two Chicago police officers while on patrol in a marked squad car. This interaction led officers to search the

Clarifying Consensual Encounters and the Attenuation Doctrine: Analyzing Evidence Admissibility in United States v. Cade Continue Reading

Silenced Speech: The Supreme Court and the Battle Over Retaliatory Arrests

In a recent case coming out of Capitol Hill, the Supreme Court issued a highly anticipated decision that grapples with retaliatory arrests, First Amendment freedoms, and the scope of the Nieves v. Bartlett “probable cause” exception. Gonzales v. Trevino reached the High Court after Sylvia Gonzalez—a 72-year-old councilwoman from Castle Hills, Texas — was arrested and charged for violating a state law that prohibits

Silenced Speech: The Supreme Court and the Battle Over Retaliatory Arrests Continue Reading

Sixth Circuit Upholds Evidence in US v. Daniel: Examining the Good-Faith Exception in Probable Cause

Today’s case comes to us from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in US v. Daniel [1]. For today’s training, we will consider an officer’s reasonable reliance on probable cause in the context of a search warrant, while exploring the boundaries of the good-faith exception. This case made its way to the Sixth Circuit after the defendant, Alejandro Daniel, was indicted for conspiracy

Sixth Circuit Upholds Evidence in US v. Daniel: Examining the Good-Faith Exception in Probable Cause Continue Reading

Navigating the Thin Line: Unraveling the Duty of Care in Law Enforcement Amidst Moral and Legal Dilemmas

In a world where every decision counts, understanding the nuances of Duty of Care, a topic of paramount importance in today’s fast-evolving legal landscape, has never been more critical. As we stand at the juncture of change and responsibility, we must address the pressing, highly controversial question: “Do officers have a duty to care to intervene in crises, and what constitutes this duty in

Navigating the Thin Line: Unraveling the Duty of Care in Law Enforcement Amidst Moral and Legal Dilemmas Continue Reading

Bronx Battleground: Unpacking Fourth Amendment Tensions in US v. Hagood

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals, in the case of United States v. Hagood, recently explored the delicate balance between law enforcement prerogatives and Fourth Amendment protections. Taking place on the streets of the Bronx, New York, the defendant, Hagood, was arrested and charged with possession of a firearm after he had previously been convicted of a felony. The defendant moved to suppress the

Bronx Battleground: Unpacking Fourth Amendment Tensions in US v. Hagood Continue Reading

Navigating the Slippery Slope of Free Speech and Retaliation in the Murphy v. Schmitt Case

The Eight Circuit’s recent decision in Murphy v. Schmitt highlights the fine balance between the First Amendment right to free speech, retaliatory claims, unlawful detention, and the discretionary powers of law enforcement officers. The central conflict in this case stems from a contentious encounter between Officer Michael Schmitt of Sunrise Beach and a local pedestrian, Mason Murphy. Before delving into the details of Murphy

Navigating the Slippery Slope of Free Speech and Retaliation in the Murphy v. Schmitt Case Continue Reading

Continue Your Education

Enhance your professional development with live, interactive instructor-led training programs.

Internal Affairs

Certification focused on identifying proper legal and operational standards for IA Investigations.
Enroll

IA Advanced

Certification focused on identifying proper legal and operational standards for IA Investigations.
Enroll

Accreditation Manager

Join top experts and thought leaders for an unparalleled law enforcement education experience.
Enroll

Related Articles

AI in Law Enforcement: Innovation, Risk, and the Road Ahead

The Future of AI in Law Enforcement The Guardian Mindset Podcast is back with a critical…

No Free Pass Behind Tinted Glass: Eighth Circuit Upholds K-9 Sniff and Miranda Waiver in U.S. v. Rose

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit recently issued a decision in the…

Author: Attorney Eric Daigle

Attorney Daigle focuses on evaluating and providing policy and training on areas of increased liability for departments across the country. Attorney Daigle’s keynote focuses on understanding current trends in legal standards, operational standards, and community concern. More importantly, the intersection between these topics to provide departments evaluation and recommendations to move forward.
This publication is produced to provide general information on the topic presented. It is distributed with the understanding that the publisher (Daigle Law Group, LLC) is not engaged in rendering legal or professional services. Although this publication is prepared by professionals, it should not be used as a substitute for professional services. If legal or other professional advice is required, the services of a professional should be sought.

Share this Legal Update

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Interactive police training, programs, and courses you can easily access anywhere.

Live Programs

Courses

Learn More