Qualified immunity is a type of legal immunity. “Qualified immunity balances two important interests—the need to hold public officials accountable when they exercise power irresponsibly and the need to shield officials from harassment, distraction, and liability when they perform their duties reasonably.” In Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982), the Supreme Court held that federal government officials are entitled to qualified immunity. The Court reasoned that “the need to protect officials who are required to exercise discretion and the related public interest in encouraging the vigorous exercise of official authority” is a necessary one. Those that claim that Qualified Immunity shields police officers from civil liability need to be informed on the balance of clearly established law and discretionary acts. Join us to see that it is important to “not throw the baby out with the bathwater” when it comes to police reform and qualified immunity.
Related Articles
Property, Pursuit, Peril: Ninth Circuit Navigates PIT Maneuvers and Police Protocols in Sabbe Case
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently decided Sabbe v. Washington County, a case that made…
Hotel Havoc Amid Fourth Amendment Search
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently rendered a decision in United States v. Montalvo Flores, examining…
Author: Attorney Eric Daigle
Attorney Daigle focuses on evaluating and providing policy and training on areas of increased liability for departments across the country. Attorney Daigle’s keynote focuses on understanding current trends in legal standards, operational standards, and community concern. More importantly, the intersection between these topics to provide departments evaluation and recommendations to move forward.
This publication is produced to provide general information on the topic presented. It is distributed with the understanding that the publisher (Daigle Law Group, LLC) is not engaged in rendering legal or professional services. Although this publication is prepared by professionals, it should not be used as a substitute for professional services. If legal or other professional advice is required, the services of a professional should be sought.
Share this Legal Update
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Interactive police training, programs, and courses you can easily access anywhere.
Live Programs
Premium subscribers receive a new training module each month on the most essential topics for Law Enforcement Supervisors.