Use of Force

Highest Court Refuses to Review 6th Circuit’s Grant of Immunity to Officer

By Adrianna Aresco, Daigle Law GroupOctober 25, 2022 The Supreme Court recently declined to take up an appeal sought by the widow of Antonio Gordon, pertaining to the 6th Circuit’s decision in Gordon v. Bierenga, which granted immunity to the police officer who fatally shot Gordon in a drive-through line during vehicular flight.  The test that governs inquiries of qualified immunity maintains that: Public Officials are afforded immunity from civil […]

Highest Court Refuses to Review 6th Circuit’s Grant of Immunity to Officer Continue Reading

The Force Must Match the Circumstance

As we have discussed in previous training sessions, protests at City Council meetings and town halls are becoming more frequent. Today’s case, Williamson v. City of National City, took place in a City Council meeting. When evaluating a Fourth Amendment claim of excessive force, the court will ask whether an officer’s actions were objectively reasonable considering the facts and circumstances surrounding the incident. While

The Force Must Match the Circumstance Continue Reading

Qualified Immunity and the Three Factors of Force: Estate of Taylor v. Salt Lake City

Our case today, from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, outlines qualified immunity and excessive use of force. Before we get into the details of the case, a recap of qualified immunity when it is weighed against alleged excessive force: the plaintiff must establish that the officer’s use of force was objectively unreasonable. When examining reasonableness, the court evaluates the

Qualified Immunity and the Three Factors of Force: Estate of Taylor v. Salt Lake City Continue Reading

SCOTUS: Qualified Immunity, Continued

In the second of two SCOTUS opinions released on the subject of qualified immunity, the Court overturned a 10th Circuit Court of Appeals decision. The Tenth Circuit Court relied on case law that “allows an officer to be held liable for a shooting that itself is objectively reasonable if the officer’s reckless or deliberate conduct created a situation requiring deadly force.1” SCOTUS emphatically stated,

SCOTUS: Qualified Immunity, Continued Continue Reading

A Refresher on Tasers – Tenth Circuit

In Emmett v. Armstrong, we travel over to the Tenth Circuit to examine a taser and UOF case. This case is from 2020, but raises some important use of force topics regarding tasers and qualified immunity.  To begin, a review of Electronic Control Weapon guidelines from IACP. According to the IACP, the ECW is authorized to be used:   to protect the officer or others from reasonably perceived immediate threat of physical

A Refresher on Tasers – Tenth Circuit Continue Reading

Mental Health, Qualified Immunity and the Luxury of Time

Today’s update focuses on a fatal use of force incident out of the 5th Circuit. Our case will review a few hot topics, including qualified immunity, mental health and use of force. To help further understand the court’s decision we have also included a link to the full video from the dashboard camera that the 5th Circuit Court of appeals strongly leaned on when deciding the outcome of

Mental Health, Qualified Immunity and the Luxury of Time Continue Reading

Related Articles

Force, Filming, and First Amendment in the Fifth Circuit

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recent decision in Perkins v. Hart casts a spotlight on…

Care or Consequence: Unraveling the Ninth Circuit’s Stance on State Created Danger in Martinez v. High

Martinez v. High, a case out of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, recently explored the…

Author: Attorney Eric Daigle

Attorney Daigle focuses on evaluating and providing policy and training on areas of increased liability for departments across the country. Attorney Daigle’s keynote focuses on understanding current trends in legal standards, operational standards, and community concern. More importantly, the intersection between these topics to provide departments evaluation and recommendations to move forward.
This publication is produced to provide general information on the topic presented. It is distributed with the understanding that the publisher (Daigle Law Group, LLC) is not engaged in rendering legal or professional services. Although this publication is prepared by professionals, it should not be used as a substitute for professional services. If legal or other professional advice is required, the services of a professional should be sought.

Share this Legal Update

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Interactive police training, programs, and courses you can easily access anywhere.

Live Programs

Courses

Learn More