Circuit Courts of Appeal

Anticipations Rise: Fifth Circuit’s Reconsidered Ruling on Pivotal Case for Citizen Journalism, Free Speech, and Qualified Immunity Awaited

The recent case of Villarreal v. City of Laredo has brought attention to the First Amendment rights of citizens and the validity of qualified immunity to law enforcement officers.1 The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit heard arguments regarding the case of a controversial citizen journalist from Laredo Texas, Priscilla Villarreal, who was arrested in 2017.  Priscilla Villarreal is facing a felony […]

Anticipations Rise: Fifth Circuit’s Reconsidered Ruling on Pivotal Case for Citizen Journalism, Free Speech, and Qualified Immunity Awaited Continue Reading

“Kettling” and Keeping the Peace

Baude v. Leyshock from the Eighth Circuit has a lot of legal issues that we have discussed and a new term that we have not, which is “kettling.” First let’s start with what we have discussed before: our case today brings to question excessive use of force during a protest. As a reminder, a court evaluates the reasonableness of the force by examining the

“Kettling” and Keeping the Peace Continue Reading

United States v. Ambriz-Villa: The Right Way to Conduct a Traffic Stop

In United States v. Ambriz-Villa, the Seventh Circuit Court dealt with a case involving a traffic stop and consent to search a suspect’s vehicle based on suspicion of drug trafficking. The suspect argued that their consent to search the vehicle was not voluntary. To evaluate the voluntariness of consent, the court considers various factors, such as the person’s age, intelligence, and education, whether they

United States v. Ambriz-Villa: The Right Way to Conduct a Traffic Stop Continue Reading

Witness’s Change of Story Causes Qualified Immunity Decision to Change

The case of Gambrel v. Knox County, 25 F.4th 391 (6th Cir. 2022) brings to light the complex issue of qualified immunity and the use of deadly force by law enforcement. The Sixth Circuit overturned a decision on qualified immunity in this case, due to a tricky aspect of determining credibility of witness statements. In this case, a witness initially supported the officers’ portrayal

Witness’s Change of Story Causes Qualified Immunity Decision to Change Continue Reading

Weighing Qualified Immunity Against Several Versions of the Same UOF Incident

In the Seventh Circuit case of Bayon v. Berkebile, qualified immunity was denied for officers who mistakenly believed that the plaintiff had a gun. The incident became complicated due to the numerous conflicting versions from both the plaintiff and the officers about the use of force. As a reminder, qualified immunity balances the need to hold public officials accountable for irresponsible use of power

Weighing Qualified Immunity Against Several Versions of the Same UOF Incident Continue Reading

Would You Use the “Stalking Horse” Maneuver?

Today’s case arises from the Seventh Circuit and introduces new terminology in the context of parolee rights. The distinguishable context of parolee rights is justified by the notion that insists- if you have broken the law once; the state has a special interest and right to check in on the individual, to assure the prevention of repeat offending instances.   In Griffin v. Wisconsin, the

Would You Use the “Stalking Horse” Maneuver? Continue Reading

Deadly Use of Force Against an Armed Suspect

Today’s case from the Ninth Circuit involves the use of deadly force by a Sergeant, who was subsequently denied qualified immunity which he later appealed. On appeal from a denial of qualified immunity, the court must determine: (1) whether there has been a violation of the constitutional right; and (2) whether that right was clearly established at the time of the officer’s alleged misconduct.

Deadly Use of Force Against an Armed Suspect Continue Reading

Clearly Established Rights and Deadly Use of Force

Our case today from the Eight Circuit highlights an alleged use of excessive force. To determine if the Officer in today’s case qualified for immunity, the court asked two questions: first, did his actions violate a constitutional right and second, was the right clearly established? To determine if a right is clearly established, the court will focus “on whether the officer had fair notice

Clearly Established Rights and Deadly Use of Force Continue Reading

Thank you for your commitment to professional growth and your dedication to staying up to date with the latest in policy and police practices. Click the button below to access our POSTC-50 Review Training Credit Form generator.
For assistance, please email help@dlglearningcenter.com or contact support.