Daigle Law Group

Daigle Law Group

Machetes and Mindsets: The Tenth Circuit’s Take on Mental Health Crises and Use of Force in Flores v. Henderson

The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit recently delivered a decision in Flores v. Henderson, a case stemming from a tragic encounter involving Shamikle Jackson and four Aurora police officers. The lawsuit was filed by Jackson’s parents after a fatal confrontation between their son and the officers, which began with a distressing 911 call and ended in Jackson’s death. This case […]

Machetes and Mindsets: The Tenth Circuit’s Take on Mental Health Crises and Use of Force in Flores v. Henderson Continue Reading

Clarifying Consensual Encounters and the Attenuation Doctrine: Analyzing Evidence Admissibility in United States v. Cade

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently considered United States v. Cade, a case that considers the Attenuation Doctrine in the context of a vehicle search and incriminatory statements. This case arose after the defendant, Brandon Cade, and a friend, T.J., caught the attention of two Chicago police officers while on patrol in a marked squad car. This interaction led officers to search the

Clarifying Consensual Encounters and the Attenuation Doctrine: Analyzing Evidence Admissibility in United States v. Cade Continue Reading

Tip-Offs and Takedowns – The Tenth Circuit’s Scrutiny of Anonymous Tips in United States v. Daniels

The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit recently reviewed United States v. Daniels, a case that tests the Fourth Amendment’s boundaries concerning when officers can lawfully detain individuals based on anonymous tips. After he was charged as a felon in possession of a firearm, Lyndell Daniels disputed his detention, prompting the court to take a close look at the standards for

Tip-Offs and Takedowns – The Tenth Circuit’s Scrutiny of Anonymous Tips in United States v. Daniels Continue Reading

Traffic Stops and Tough Questions: Parole Inquiries Under the Fourth Amendment in United States v. Ramirez

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently rendered a decision in the case of United States v. Ramirez, exploring the limits of the Fourth Amendment’s protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. In this case, the focus narrows in on a traffic stop scenario where an officer approached the vehicle and initiated the encounter by asking the driver, “What’s up, my man? You on probation

Traffic Stops and Tough Questions: Parole Inquiries Under the Fourth Amendment in United States v. Ramirez Continue Reading

United States v. Ronquillo: Tenth Circuit Affirms Conviction and Defines Curtilage in Fourth Amendment Search

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, the case of United States v. Ronquillo recently considered officers’ actions during the execution of a search warrant. The Tenth Circuit was tasked with confronting the parameters of what constitutes curtilage for purposes of defining the permissible boundaries of a Fourth Amendment search. The aftermath of a SWAT raid authorized by warrant resulted in the

United States v. Ronquillo: Tenth Circuit Affirms Conviction and Defines Curtilage in Fourth Amendment Search Continue Reading

Seizure Scrutiny in the Streets: The Third Circuit’s Take on ‘United States v. Amos’ and the Ambiguity of Authority

The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently heard United States v. Amos, a case delves into the Fourth Amendment, specifically focusing on the threshold of reasonable suspicion required for a lawful seizure.1   On a September night in 2018, Officers Hugo Lemos and Nicholas Mastroianni, patrolling in southwest Philadelphia, received a distress call near Eddie’s Café. Upon arrival, they found the

Seizure Scrutiny in the Streets: The Third Circuit’s Take on ‘United States v. Amos’ and the Ambiguity of Authority Continue Reading

Property, Pursuit, Peril: Ninth Circuit Navigates PIT Maneuvers and Police Protocols in Sabbe Case

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently decided Sabbe v. Washington County, a case that made its way to the Circuit after law enforcement responded to a disturbance call and executed a PIT maneuver, in attempts to seize a hostile individual from their own private property. On appeal, the Ninth Circuit considered the officers’ emergency response protocols, the warrantless entry to the property, and

Property, Pursuit, Peril: Ninth Circuit Navigates PIT Maneuvers and Police Protocols in Sabbe Case Continue Reading

Sixth Circuit Upholds Evidence in US v. Daniel: Examining the Good-Faith Exception in Probable Cause

Today’s case comes to us from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in US v. Daniel [1]. For today’s training, we will consider an officer’s reasonable reliance on probable cause in the context of a search warrant, while exploring the boundaries of the good-faith exception. This case made its way to the Sixth Circuit after the defendant, Alejandro Daniel, was indicted for conspiracy

Sixth Circuit Upholds Evidence in US v. Daniel: Examining the Good-Faith Exception in Probable Cause Continue Reading

Navigating the Thin Line: Unraveling the Duty of Care in Law Enforcement Amidst Moral and Legal Dilemmas

In a world where every decision counts, understanding the nuances of Duty of Care, a topic of paramount importance in today’s fast-evolving legal landscape, has never been more critical. As we stand at the juncture of change and responsibility, we must address the pressing, highly controversial question: “Do officers have a duty to care to intervene in crises, and what constitutes this duty in

Navigating the Thin Line: Unraveling the Duty of Care in Law Enforcement Amidst Moral and Legal Dilemmas Continue Reading

Bronx Battleground: Unpacking Fourth Amendment Tensions in US v. Hagood

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals, in the case of United States v. Hagood, recently explored the delicate balance between law enforcement prerogatives and Fourth Amendment protections. Taking place on the streets of the Bronx, New York, the defendant, Hagood, was arrested and charged with possession of a firearm after he had previously been convicted of a felony. The defendant moved to suppress the

Bronx Battleground: Unpacking Fourth Amendment Tensions in US v. Hagood Continue Reading