A proper, objective analysis of a use of force incident must focus on the facts and circumstances that confronted the officer at the moment the force was applied. This perspective is the foundation of a reasonable and competent evaluation. However, critiques often drift into hindsight—focusing on what the officer could have or should have done to avoid the outcome. This approach undermines fair and responsible assessment.
This presentation will explore the critical difference between proper analysis and hindsight-driven critique. A real-world case study will be used to:
- Provide practical insights for law enforcement, legal professionals, and civilian reviewers
- Highlight the principles of objective use of force evaluation
- Distinguish between valid analysis and unproductive criticism
- Demonstrate how officer performance is shaped by real-time factors
Our training experts recommend this course for all supervisors, command staff, and law enforcement leaders looking to strengthen decision-making, accountability, and community trust.
Instructors: Eric P. Daigle
Principal Eric P. Daigle practices civil litigation in federal and state courts. His experience includes civil and criminal matters related to civil rights actions, including police misconduct litigation and employment actions, as well as premises and general tort liability. His experience focuses on consulting and expert witness cases related to police and security operations.
- Credit Hours: 1
- Class ID: 25-42-2-A1
- Areas: 206
- Topic: Use of Force
Please click here to contact the DLG Learning Center support staff with any questions about this course.